<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ETF 92-8 Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investwithanedge.com/the-etf-92-8-rule/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investwithanedge.com/the-etf-92-8-rule</link>
	<description>Actionable Ideas for Your ETFs, Funds, &#38; Stocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:57:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Bellantoni</title>
		<link>http://investwithanedge.com/the-etf-92-8-rule/comment-page-1#comment-17288</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bellantoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investwithanedge.com/?p=5829#comment-17288</guid>
		<description>The catchy part of the &quot;92-8&quot; rule is that the two numbers add to 100%.   There is no reason that 92% of the ETF-ETN&#039;s could not account for 92% of the volume.    It&#039;s just snappier if the two add to 100%.    

What is really being conveyed here is a single high-impact sample of the distribution of ADVT among the ETF-ETN&#039;s.  If we lined up the ETF-ETN&#039;s on the x-axis, in descending order of ADVT, and plotted the cumulative ADVT on the y-axis, the &quot;92-8&quot; rule is just a point on the curve.    In fact, if we normalize both axes to range from 0 to 100%, then there is just one such point on every AVT-ETFN curve, and it is the point at which x+y=100.

This is all pretty obvious but I thought it worth mentioning anyway.  Since the point is unique, no matter what we are dealing with, we can legitimately ask for the &quot;crossing point&quot; in lots of interesting situations.   What is the crossing point of profits among US companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The catchy part of the &#8220;92-8&#8243; rule is that the two numbers add to 100%.   There is no reason that 92% of the ETF-ETN&#8217;s could not account for 92% of the volume.    It&#8217;s just snappier if the two add to 100%.    </p>
<p>What is really being conveyed here is a single high-impact sample of the distribution of ADVT among the ETF-ETN&#8217;s.  If we lined up the ETF-ETN&#8217;s on the x-axis, in descending order of ADVT, and plotted the cumulative ADVT on the y-axis, the &#8220;92-8&#8243; rule is just a point on the curve.    In fact, if we normalize both axes to range from 0 to 100%, then there is just one such point on every AVT-ETFN curve, and it is the point at which x+y=100.</p>
<p>This is all pretty obvious but I thought it worth mentioning anyway.  Since the point is unique, no matter what we are dealing with, we can legitimately ask for the &#8220;crossing point&#8221; in lots of interesting situations.   What is the crossing point of profits among US companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Rowland</title>
		<link>http://investwithanedge.com/the-etf-92-8-rule/comment-page-1#comment-5514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investwithanedge.com/?p=5829#comment-5514</guid>
		<description>Tony,

If you own DXO, then I recommend you sell it in the open market prior to September 9.  You do not want to go through the redemption process because you do not know how long your money will be tied up.

Also see...
http://investwithanedge.com/dxo-becomes-first-victim-of-cftc-activity

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>If you own DXO, then I recommend you sell it in the open market prior to September 9.  You do not want to go through the redemption process because you do not know how long your money will be tied up.</p>
<p>Also see&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://investwithanedge.com/dxo-becomes-first-victim-of-cftc-activity" rel="nofollow">http://investwithanedge.com/dxo-becomes-first-victim-of-cftc-activity</a></p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://investwithanedge.com/the-etf-92-8-rule/comment-page-1#comment-5466</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investwithanedge.com/?p=5829#comment-5466</guid>
		<description>Hi Ron.
What is the story with DXO today?  They are having a share redemption?  What is the process for this.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron.<br />
What is the story with DXO today?  They are having a share redemption?  What is the process for this.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.311 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 21:07:42 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
