DailyFinance Catches up on the ETF Wars

March 22, 2010 by Ron Rowland  
Filed under Commentary, ETFs, In The News

Comments Off

Several weeks ago, Invest with an Edge brought you coverage over the escalating Commission Wars over ETFs being waged by two discount brokerage behemoths, Fidelity and Schwab.   It appears that other media outlets are starting to consider the possible far reaching impacts of a struggle between these two.  What are the benefits to Schwab and Fidelity’s announcements?  What do investor’s need to be wary of?  What might be on the horizon?

DailyFinance and Sheryl Nance-Nash tackled some of these burning questions and more in a recent article, “Do Free ETFs Have a Hidden Price Tag?”  In bringing her piece to press, Sheryl relied on the expertise of one of our featured contributors, Brian Campos, who is the Director of Capital Cities Asset Management, our investment advisory affiliate.

Excerpts below impress upon the investing public that they should sit up and take note of what dominoes are falling around them.  I’m positive we’ll be hearing more about this subject in the coming months.

“As the two heavyweights battle it out in their never-ending quest for more assets to join their platform, Joe Q. Public gets an initial trading reduction. However, the underlying benefit is access, explains Brian Campos, director of wealth management at Capital Cities Asset Management. “ETFs enjoy several major benefits over mutual funds, and now investors won’t be hindered by trading costs to join the ETF universe,” he adds.

He goes on to address some of the possible disadvantages that investors must be aware of:

“This can be a drawback for investors who desire more specialized investments such as country/region specific portfolios, sector portfolios or special asset portfolios,” points out Campos. Fidelity has yet to include iShares’ other funds in their new offering. “Schwab’s’ offering is even more incomplete as they offer no fixed income portfolios and few differences in capitalization and style portfolios,” he adds

For this and more insights about the ETF price wars, here’s the entire article.

Psst – iShares for Sale; Ned, You Listening?

March 17, 2009 by John Schloegel  
Filed under Business News, Commentary, ETFs

Barclays PLC, the London-based financial conglomerate, is seeking a buyer for its San Francisco-based iShares unit.  iShares, an ETF juggernaut, has approximately $300 Billion under management.  This division is officially a unit of Baclays Global Investors, a shop with over $1.5 Trillion under management.  iShares is a prized asset to its parent, and the fact that the shaky parent is willing to sell only confirms how bad things are in the financial services arena.  Ok, so that’s the background.  What’s the big deal?

The San Francisco Chronicle quotes a source as saying potential buyers are: JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, a large mutual fund company, or a competing exchange-traded fund provider.  Our advice: privately-held Fidelity Investments should swoop in and pick up iShares immediately.  They can instantly gain a stronghold on such an important (and growing) product area to which they currently do not have much exposure.

Fidelity, as one of the largest U.S. mutual fund companies, needs an ETF offering if they seek to continue to be one of the premier investment firms in the country.  Right now they are slowly losing their grip on asset management expertise and what was once a super-sized set of mutual funds.  They were a pioneer in sector-based mutual funds, catering to an informed crowd of investors seeking to buy and sell sector-specific securities.  At one time, customers could trade sectors on an hour by hour basis with NAVs set periodically during the day.  Fidelity has slowly moved away from that model; upfront sales loads and hourly pricing were replaced with redemption fees and 30 day holding periods.  They went from catering to active and informed traders to a firm preventing investors from actively managing portfolios.

Somehow they’ve completely missed the ETF revolution.  Yes, they have an ETF – the Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ), but it barely has any assets and has little volume.  One has to wonder what discussions have taken place in the esteemed halls of Fidelity over the years as they watched the ETF revolution from the sidelines.  Well, they’ve been presented the opportunity of a lifetime to get back fully in the game and to reclaim their place at the top echelon of financial service providers in one lightning-quick move.  Barclay’s troubles are Fidelity’s gains.  Are they ready to pounce?