Boomers Reach RMD Age, and Latin America Rises
The baby boomer generation will begin forced mandatory distributions from their retirement accounts this year. The question at hand is whether or not we have reached the peak 401(k) inflection point. IRAs and 401(k) plans have been providing baby boomers (people born between 1946 and 1964) with a tax-deferred approach to saving for retirement. However, one key provision of those plans is that required minimum distributions (“RMDs”) must commence in the year the owner reaches 70½. That year is 2017 for the leading edge of baby boomer generation.
All three words that make up the RMD acronym are important. For many, this will be the first time to receive a “distribution” from their retirement account. Previously, it was a contribution plan, with money flowing in and hopefully appreciating in value. Distributions flow the other way, and now money is coming out of those accounts.
Whether you need the cash or not, these annual withdrawals are “required” distributions. Not only do you have to take them, they are also taxable income, and you will be liable for the income taxes. That tax you deferred many years ago is now coming due.
The government also specified the “minimum” amount you must withdraw every year. The actual amount is a function of your age and account balance using the IRS distribution tables. For example, a person 70 years old must use a distribution period of 27.4 years. Therefore, the distribution percentage is calculated by taking the inverse (1 divided by 27.4), which is 3.65%. If your 2016 year-end balance was $300,000, then your 2017 distribution needs to be at least $10,950. As you get older, the distribution period shrinks and your minimum percentage increases. For someone like Betty White, who just turned 95, the distribution period is 8.6 years, making the minimum distribution 11.6% of the previous year-end balance.
These RMD rules apply even if you are still working and haven’t retired. Additionally, you are no longer able to make any contributions, forcing the flows to reverse direction. With the baby boomers now reaching this turning point, the aggregate flows across all 401(k) plans may be reaching a turning point too.
According to data from the Labor Department, the total amount of money flowing into U.S. tax-sheltered workplace retirement plans has exceeded outflows for all but a few years. The exceptions included 1999 and 2000, when the strong market gains of 1998 and 1999 pushed year-end balances and their resulting RMDs higher.
The other exceptions were 2013 and 2014. Net outflows totaled about $9 billion in 2013 and nearly $25 billion in 2014, establishing a record. One might be tempted to claim this is just another blip, similar to 1999 and 2000, but other factors are now at work. Since data for 2015 and 2016 is not available yet, we are left to speculate about the last two years. However, net annual flows peaked in 2009 and moved steadily lower the ensuing five years. If you believe in trends, the trend is moving lower.
As previously mentioned, the other factors at play include the baby boomer generation moving into the RMD zone. There are a reported 75 million baby boomers, and collectively, they have amassed about $10 trillion in various tax-deferred retirement accounts. Therefore, the relatively tiny $25 billion of outflows will not make a dent in the overall balance. In fact, a nominal market gain of 5% should boost assets by about $500 billion, more than offsetting the distribution-related outflows.
Therefore, given the demographics trends, there is a reasonable chance we have achieved peak 401(k) in terms of net contributions, at least for the baby boomer generation. As for achieving peak 401(k) in terms of overall assets, we still have a ways to go. When you hear the fearmongers screaming about the imminent collapse of the stock market due to baby boomer withdrawals, you can take it with a grain of salt—at least for the time being.
Action is strongest in the global categories, and volatility in the Latin America ETF is now a positive contributor. Sector and factor movements are subdued, while the leadership provided by Financials and High Beta remains intact.
Sectors: The sector leadership rankings are starting to sound like a broken record, just repeating “Financials are on top” over and over again. Indeed, the Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has registered the highest momentum reading among our sector benchmark ETFs for 11 consecutive weeks. Additionally, it has ranked no lower than third for 15 weeks. Telecom ascended to the second-place slot three weeks ago and sits there again today. Materials, Technology, and Industrials are in a tight battle for third, with Consumer Discretionary close behind. Utilities posted the largest momentum increase, allowing it to move a notch higher. Health Care weakened and slipped to 10th, while Consumer Staples remains on the bottom.
Factors: All but two of the factor benchmark ETFs posted momentum declines this week. Low Volatility and Momentum were the two exceptions, as both squeezed out a one-point improvement and climbed a notch in the rankings. Although Yield turned in a relatively flat performance for the week, it managed to fall three places to land on the bottom. This appears to be a contradiction to the improvement mentioned above for Utilities, which happens to be the highest-yielding sector category. The top five ranked factors of High Beta, Small Size, Value, Fundamental, and Market Cap have been unchanged for five weeks.
Global: Compared to the subdued movements among the sectors and factors, the global categories seem to be the home of recent market action. That becomes more obvious when you realize that only one global category lost momentum over the past week, and that category happens to be the United States. The iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF), our Latin America benchmark, has been quite volatile. Sitting at the top 11 weeks ago, it fell to last place during the first five weeks of the post-election period. Over the past four weeks, Latin America has climbed from the bottom to second place, and it is now challenging Canada for the top spot. EAFE and Emerging Markets were the only other categories with relative-strength improvements. The U.S. has dropped from first to sixth the past two weeks. Others posting a decline in relative strength include the Eurozone, World Equity, and Japan.
The charts above depict both the relative strength and absolute strength of various market sectors, styles, and geographic locations on an intermediate-term basis. Each grouping is sorted (top to bottom) by relative strength. The magnitude of the displayed RSM value is a measure of absolute strength, which is our proprietary method of measuring and reporting the intermediate-term strength as an annualized value.
Disclosure: Author has no positions in any of the securities mentioned and no positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) is received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.
“As the baby boomers like me are retiring and getting ready to retire,
they will spend whatever it takes—and they’re the wealthiest generation in our country—
to make themselves live an enjoyable life in their retirement years.”
—David Rubenstein, CEO of the Carlyle Group
© 2016 Dynamic Performance Publishing, Inc. – All Rights Reserved. This material is protected under U.S. copyright law and is provided for the exclusive use of our members for personal purposes. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by Dynamic Performance Publishing or our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Any investment recommended in this email should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Dynamic Performance Publishing, its affiliates, and clients may hold positions in the recommended securities. Results are not indicative of holdings for clients of Flexible Plan Investments. Forwarding, copying, or otherwise duplicating this information for the use by anyone other than the intended recipient is expressly forbidden. Any retransmission of this material by you is your authorization to us to debit your credit card, or otherwise bill you, for a full price one-year membership for each violation. It may also cause your membership to be revoked without a refund. Any such action on our part does not prevent us from seeking additional legal remedies.