ETF Investers are able to do good while doing well

The introduction of ETFs in the 1990s is an example of how markets and their regulators respond to investor interests. When ETFs were first introduced, they were based on broad market indexes that were widely known and used by investors. As the years have gone by and investors have become more familiar with ETFs and how they may be used in portfolios, ETF issuers have continually tried to tailor new ETFs to address investors’ increasingly targeted interests. This is particularly true for environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) investing.

Investor interest in doing good while doing well in their investments is growing. According to a report published by SSGA last year, total ESG assets under management worldwide were estimated to be nearly $22 trillion (see graphic below). It is for that reason that we are seeing an increasing number of ETFs being issued with an ESG focus.

Total ESG Asset Under Management, Invest With An Edge

In any discussion on this topic it is important to understand that ESG is a catch-all phrase, not a term with a single definition. Also, it should not be confused with the term “green,” which deals almost exclusively with the “E” component of ESG.  Going beyond the common green label, the environmental component includes consideration of energy use, energy efficiency, pollution risk, natural resource conservation, and animal abuse, to name a few.

The “S” (social) component of ESG includes things like a company’s efforts to select suppliers with effective and improving ESG efforts, their contributions to the communities in which it operates, whether they allow their employees to take time off to volunteer in their communities, and whether a company maintains a healthy, safe, and good work environment for its employees.

The “G” (governance) component deals with a company’s transparency in policies, practices, and accounting. Also considered are its diversity of employees and leadership, inclusion of stockholders in corporate policy making, and avoidance of conflicts of interest among its board members.

As one can see, ESG is a far-reaching set of criteria by which companies may be evaluated. As a result, there are a number of firms that evaluate and score companies on the basis of their ESG qualities. One way this can be done is via an exclusionary process whereby a company can “fail” an ESG evaluation by doing any of a particular set of actions, or by not doing another set of actions. Another approach growing in popularity is to create an ESG score based on a company’s efforts from a sustainability perspective.

One way this is done is by scoring a company with positive points for ESG actions that are supportive to its sustainability score, and deducting points for actions that are detrimental to its sustainability score. This method allows each company to be ranked within its industry, economic sector, or the market as a whole, and gives credit to companies for their efforts to improve their sustainable score and rank.

All of that is fine, but how does an ETF get an ESG score? Well, one way to do this is to take each of the holdings in the ETF portfolio, weight each of the individual holdings’ score by the weight of the position in the portfolio, and sum up those weighted scores. While this seems simple enough, the challenge comes in determining which method of scoring is used for each company in the first place. Remember, I said there are a number of methods of scoring companies on the basis of their ESG efforts. The standard will develop over time as ESG investing interest grows.

The question for investors, then, becomes one of knowing how to incorporate ETFs that use ESG factors into their portfolios. Of course, this depends on how important such factors are to each investor. For example, an investor could choose to craft their portfolio allocation as determined by their risk tolerance and then use, when available, ETFs that meet the allocation parameters PLUS have an attractive ESG score or rank. A more strict method would be to consider only ETFs that have an attractive ESG score when crafting the allocation. In either of these approaches, the definition of an attractive ESG score or rank is left to the discretion of each investor.

When thinking of ESG scores for companies, it is easy to assume that this factor only applies to stocks, but that is not true. A company’s ESG score is as applicable to their bonds as it is to their stock. Furthermore, it can also be used in scoring non-U.S. firms when data is available. The argument has been made in the past that using strict “green” screening criteria for companies and funds when building a portfolio limited a portfolio’s ability to diversify and, therefore, to perform well in ever-changing market conditions. The days of having to give up performance in order to promote and encourage positive ESG policies and practices within your portfolio are largely a thing of the past. For example, below is a 5-year graph that compares a balanced fund with an average of 254 stock and bond sustainable mutual funds. Using ESG scores and rankings enables investors to do good, while doing well with their investments.

Mutual/Index Fund Chart, Invest With An Edge

Disclosure: Author has no positions in any of the securities mentioned and no positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) is received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

Weekly Edge: ETF Relative Strength Tells a Tale of Capital Flows

No investment category can be a market leader in all market conditions. Changes in relative strength help identify when various sectors, factors, and global regions fall in and out of favor. Some changes in leadership are shorter term in nature and those tend to be driven by current news of interest to investors. Longer term changes in leadership tend to be based on more macro factors like economic trends and changes in political leadership or policies.

The world has not been short of dramatic news recently. We have election news from Europe, inflation news from South America, and continued uncertainty over developing U.S. economic, tax, and healthcare policies. The fact is that global news like this is more the norm than the exception. That is one of the benefits of following market leading industry, factor, and geographic-region ETFs. When investment capital moves domestically or globally, it drives prices up where it is moving to and leaves a trail of lagging or falling prices from the source. This is the driving force behind relative strength. Identifying and following this flow of capital has proven to be advantageous to those investors who watch these flows.

Sectors: The leading Sector Benchmark ETFs for the past several weeks are suggesting that the economy is growing and expected to continue growing, and investors are comfortable taking on risk from sectors that will benefit the most from that growth. That means Technology, Discretionary, and Industrials remain at the top of the relative strength leader board. At the other end of the relative strength spectrum are Real Estate, Telecom, and Energy. The latter may be explained by the fear of how rising interest rates may affect real estate, price wars affecting telecom earnings, and an oil glut holding down energy prices. Given that the leaders and laggards have not changed much in recent weeks, one interpretation is that investors are voting with their dollars that we are not in the midst of a meaningful change that will impact market leadership.

Factors: Momentum is the top factor among our Factor Benchmark ETFs again this week. This is followed by Growth and Market Cap, with the latter moving up one slot in the rankings this week. Small company slid three slots in the rankings to sixth. Yield, High Beta, and Value remain at the bottom of the relative strength rankings. There were not a lot of large changes in the rankings that would suggest a change in favorable investor sentiment or commitment toward investing in the more growth-oriented areas of the stock market.

Global: There were more relative strength rank changes among our Global Benchmark ETFs than among the sector or factor rankings. Two things that stand out among the ranking leaders are that they are generally large-cap established markets and that they are in non-U.S. regions. The leading regions were Eurozone, EAFE, and UK. The latter moved up two slots in the rankings this past week. The lagging regions were Canada, Latin America, and Pacific x-Japan. This is interesting because Japan moved up three slots to seventh on the list from next to last. Our Global Benchmark ETFs have five regions exhibiting more than 20 momentum points, which is more than in any of our other Benchmark ETF ranking groups.

Weekly Edge 051017, Sector Edge, Factor Edge, Global Edge, Invest With An Edge

Disclosure: Author has no positions in any of the securities mentioned and no positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) is received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

“Although ETFs only own 6 percent of the stock market, they account for about 30 percent of trading volume — double what it was 10 years ago.”

—Eric Balchunas, Bloomberg View May 4, 2017

© 2017 Dynamic Performance Publishing, Inc. – All Rights Reserved. This material is protected under U.S. copyright law and is provided for the exclusive use of our members for personal purposes. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by Dynamic Performance Publishing or our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Any investment recommended in this email should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Dynamic Performance Publishing, its affiliates, and clients may hold positions in the recommended securities. Results are not indicative of holdings for clients of Flexible Plan Investments. Forwarding, copying, or otherwise duplicating this information for the use by anyone other than the intended recipient is expressly forbidden. Any retransmission of this material by you is your authorization to us to debit your credit card, or otherwise bill you, for a full price one-year membership for each violation. It may also cause your membership to be revoked without a refund. Any such action on our part does not prevent us from seeking additional legal remedies.

Subscribe to the Invest With An Edge weekly newsletter

And receive our special retirement report, Living on a Million-Dollar Portfolio

Subscribe to receive the Invest With An Edge weekly newsletter and receive our special retirement report, Living on a Million-Dollar Portfolio

Please provide your information below:

* indicates required
Please add to your Address Book or Contacts to ensure you are receiving your newsletter to your inbox.

Sign up for our investment advisory service, All Star Investor:

Explore and improve your ETF game

Check us out on twitter:

Follow us on twitter

  • Categories

  • Tags