New Revenue-Weighted Quant ETF Launched Today: RWV
January 23, 2009 by Ron Rowland
Filed under Commentary, ETF IPOs (New ETFs), ETFs
The press release touts it as a quant-driven ETF; applying revenue-weighting to Navellier’s alpha generating all-cap quantitative strategy. Louis Navellier’s approach to the market, and the methodology employed by RevenueShares both have merit, but a peak under the covers of this new ETF offering reveals a lot of hypotheticals.
Description/Objective: RevenueShares Navellier Overall A-100 Fund (RWV) seeks to outperform the total return performance of the Navellier Overall A-100 Index by using revenue weighting instead of the equal-weighting methodology employed by Navellier.
That all sounds well and good, but a google search of “Navellier Overall A-100 Index” turned up a total of only seven hits today, and all seven were related to either today’s announcement or the SEC filing of last July. In other words, the Navellier Overall A-100 Index did not exist before today, it is a new hypothetically backtested index.
Furthermore, it is not even the index the ETF is based on. Go back and read the description again.
The ETF is based on a RevenueShares version of the index, which is a hypothetically backtested modification to the hypothetically backtested index. In other words, it is hypothetical-squared. The RevenueShares ETF fact sheet adds, “…returns are historical and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Index returns became publicly available 1/23/09 and performance shown prior to this date is based on hypothetical backtested…” Translation: The returns are historical, but history starts today.
They also disclosed that the hypothetical-squared testing resulted in a -55.39% return in 2008 and graciously added a 10-year linear (non-logarithmic) chart illustrating this plunge even more dramatically. The data also indicates you should expect volatility to be 63% greater than the Russell 3000 index.
On its first day of trading, 1490 shares of RWV changed hands.
Disclosure: no positions in RWV



Comments