Eight of the new members were launched in July 2011, and having now reached six months of age, they no longer receive a free pass that excludes them from consideration.  The other fifteen have been around a while, including BLDRS Europe 100 ADR (ADRU) launched in 2002.  Reaching a 3-year or 5-year age milestone is no guarantee of continued success.

Trading activity picked up enough the past few months to allow three products to escape the list:  Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3x (RETL), iPath Pure Beta Broad Commodity ETN (BCM), and SPDR S&P International Utilities (IPU) prove that membership is not a one-way street.

Two products had zero volume for the month of January.  Morgan Stanley S&P 500 Crude Oil ETN (BARL) and iPath Long Extended 3x Russell 1000 TR ETN (ROLA) failed to attract any investor interest.  After going more than three months without any trades, iPath US Treasury 5-Year Bull ETN (DFVL) finally saw 215 shares change hands on January 18.

Becoming a member of ETF Deathwatch does not automatically imply bad performance or poor construction.  Often it’s the result of investors not being aware of the products.  I believe one such example is the Market Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT).  I happen to own this fund, and it has gained about 22% the past six months, while kicking out a tax exempt yield of more than 5%.  There are likely to be other gems hiding in this list.

The 23 ETPs added to ETF Deathwatch for February 2012:

1. BLDRS Europe 100 ADR (ADRU)
2. First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX (FYC)
3. IQ Emerging Markets Mid Cap ETF (EMER)
4. iPath Long Enhanced 2x S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VZZB)
5. iPath Pure Beta Livestock ETN (LSTK)
6. iPath Pure Beta Sugar ETN (SGAR)
7. iPath US Treasury 2-year Yield Bear ETN (DTUS)
8. iPath US Treasury 5-Year Yield Bear ETN (DFVS)
9. iPath US Treasury 5-Year Yield Bull ETN (DFVL)
10. iShares FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Europe (IFEU)
11. iShares S&P Target Date 2010 Index Fund (TZD)
12. iShares S&P Target Date 2015 Index Fund (TZE)
13. iShares S&P Target Date 2020 Index Fund (TZG)
14. Market Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT)
15. PowerShares Active Low Duration (PLK)
16. PowerShares DB Commodity Double Long ETN (DYY)
17. PowerShares Dynamic Lux Nanotech (PXN)
18. PowerShares Fundamental Pure Small Core (PXSC)  
19. RevenueShares Navellier Overall A-100 (RWV)
20. SPDR S&P International Financial (IPF)
21. UBS ETRACS Monthly 2x Leveraged Next Generation Internet ETN (EIPL)
22. UBS ETRACS Next Generation Internet ETN (EIPO)
23. WisdomTree Global Real Return Fund (RRF)

The 3 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch for February 2012:

1. Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3x (RETL)
2. iPath Pure Beta Broad Commodity ETN (BCM)  
3. SPDR S&P International Utilities (IPU)

The ETF Deathwatch criteria produced the following list of 288 ETPs for February:

ETF Deathwatch for February 2012

Data sources:  Daily prices and volume of individual ETPs from Norgate Premium Data. All other information compiled by Invest With An Edge.

Past issues of ETF Deathwatch are available here.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher: Long XMPT. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

ETF/ETN assets under management climbed 8.4% to $1.15 trillion, most of which came from market gains rather than new investments.  The largest product, SPDR S&P 500 (SPY), ended the month with more than $99 billion in assets and is on track to soon cross the $100 billion threshold.

Trading activity slipped with dollar volume (value traded) across all ETPs coming in at $1.16 trillion for the month.  This is a -13% drop from December and a whopping -60% plunge from the $2.92 trillion pace in August 2011.  Monthly dollar volume for January was the lowest since December 2010’s $1.11 trillion.  Of course there were 21% fewer ETPs at that time, so January’s results were even worse on an “average per fund” basis.

Nonetheless, the number of ETFs averaging more than $1 billion in daily trading activity (the Billion Dollar Club) actually increased from 7 to 8 in January.  The percentage of all ETP dollars traded by this group slipped from 56% to 55%.  This suggests trading activity is moving down the food chain, away from the top tier.  The trend was also evident in the next tier; the number of products averaging more than $100 million of trading per day grew from 68 to 72 while their percentage of all ETP dollar volume slipped from 89% to 88%.

Data sources:  Daily prices and volume of individual ETPs from Norgate Premium Data, AUM from ETF Industry Association, fund counts and all other information compiled by Invest With An Edge

New products launched in January (sorted by name):

1. AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Opportunities ETF (ACCU)
2. AdvisorShares Rockledge SectorSAM ETF (SSAM)
3. Direxion S&P 1500 RC Volatility Response Shares (VSPR)
4. Direxion S&P 500 RC Volatility Response Shares (VSPY)
5. Direxion S&P Latin America 40 RC Volatility Response Shares (VLAT)
6. iShares MSCI Australia Small Cap Index Fund (EWAS)
7. iShares MSCI Canada Small Cap Index Fund (EWCS)
8. iShares MSCI Denmark Capped Investable Market Index Fund (EDEN)
9. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EMEA Index Fund (EEME)
10. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index Fund (EEML)
11. iShares MSCI Finland Capped Investable Market Index Fund (EFNL)
12. iShares MSCI Germany Small Cap Index Fund (EWGS)
13. iShares MSCI Hong Kong Small Cap Index Fund (EWHS)
14. iShares MSCI Norway Capped Investable Market Index Fund (ENOR)
15. iShares MSCI Singapore Small Cap Index Fund (EWSS)
16. iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small Cap Index Fund (EWUS)
17. iShares MSCI World Index Fund (URTH)
18. PowerShares S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility Portfolio (EELV)
19. PowerShares S&P International Developed Low Volatility Portfolio (IDLV)
20. ProShares German Sovereign/Sub-Sovereign ETF (GGOV)
21. ProShares 30 Year TIPS/TSY Spread (RINF)
22. ProShares Short 30 Year TIPS/TSY Spread (FINF)
23. SPDR S&P Small Cap Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMFS)

January new product reviews are contained in First Seven New ETFs of 2012, Nine More ETFs Emerge, and Seven Single-Country ETFs from iShares on BATS.

Product closures/delistings in January (sorted by name):

none

Product changes in January:

1. Barclays GEMS Asia 8 ETN (AYT) was renamed iPath GEMS Asia 8 ETN (AYT) 1/10/12.
2. Barclays GEMS Index ETN (JEM) was renamed iPath GEMS Index ETN (JEM) 1/10/12.
3. Barclays Asian & Gulf Currency Revaluation ETN (PGD) was renamed iPath Asian & Gulf Currency Revaluation ETN (PGD) 1/10/12.

Announced Product Changes for Coming Months:

1. Five of the Van Eck’s new ETFs that replaced HOLDRS will undergo share splits effective February 14.  Market Vectors Oil Services (OIH), Market Vectors Biotech (BBH), and Market Vectors Retail (RTH) will split 3-for-1.  Market Vectors Pharmaceutical (PPH) and Market Vectors Bank and Brokerage (RKH) will split 2-for-1.
2. Global X announced that February 16, 2012 will be the last day of trading for 8 Global X ETFs: Global X Russell Emerging Markets Growth (EMGX), Global X Russell Emerging Markets Value (EMVX), Global X Mexico Small-Cap (MEXS), Global X Oil Equities (XOIL), Global X Farming (BARN), Global X Fishing Industry (FISN), Global X Food (EATX), and Global X Waste Management (WSTE).

Previous monthly ETF statistics reports are available here.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, publisher, and affiliates: No positions in any of the securities mentioned. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

January was a busy month for BlackRock, which rolled out a dozen new iShares-branded international ETFs in the month.  Even more interesting, the listings were done on three different U.S. stock exchanges.

BlackRock’s first batch of new ETFs for 2012 went the traditional route through NYSE Arca, which typically gets the lion’s share of new ETF listings.  Two more iShares international ETFs emerged on the Nasdaq on January 19.

The third wave, consisting of seven more single-country ETFs, were the first ETFs with a primary listing on BATS Global Markets, the third largest stock exchange in the U.S.  iShares MSCI Norway Capped Investable Market Index Fund (ENOR) became the first BATS-listed ETF on January 24.  Six more ETFs followed two days later.

Here is the rundown on the three new Nordic country funds:

iShares MSCI Denmark Capped Investable Market Index Fund (EDEN) launched on January 26 with a 0.53% expense ratio.  The underlying MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index is a custom, free float-adjusted market capitalization index.  Largest allocations among the 32 holdings are Novo Nordisk 23.1%, Danske Bank 7.3%, AP Moeller-Maersk 7.2%, Carlsberg 5.9%, and DSV 4.2%.  Sector representation includes Health Care 35.5%, Industrials 27.0%, Financials 15.8%, Consumer Staples 8.5%, and Materials 6.3%.  (EDEN overview)

iShares MSCI Finland Capped Investable Market Index Fund (EFNL) began trading on January 26 with an expense ratio of 0.53%.  The underlying MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index is a custom, free float-adjusted market capitalization index.  The fund has 43 holdings, led by Nokia with 15.9%, Sampo 9.1%, Fortum 8.5%, Kone 6.9%, and UPM-Kymmene 5.3%.  Sector breakdown includes Industrials 28.3%, Technology 16.9%, Materials 16.0%, and Financials 13.0%.  (EFNL overview)

iShares MSCI Norway Capped Investable Market Index Fund (ENOR) came out on January 24 with an expense ratio of 0.53%.  The underlying MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index is a custom, free float-adjusted market capitalization index.  The fund’s 52 holdings are topped by Statoil 20.6%, Telenor 7.5%, Seadrill 7.4%, DNB 6.7%, and Orkla 4.7%.  Top sector breakdown is Energy 50.1%, Financials 13.0%, Materials 9.1%, Telecommunications 7.5%, and Industrials 7.4%.  (ENOR overview)

Analysis/Opinion: Not so long ago that accessing the Nordic countries via ETFs was difficult.  While iShares MSCI Sweden (EWD) has been around for more than 15 years, it was the only choice until Global X FTSE Nordic Region ETF (GXF) arrived in August of 2009.  Fifteen months later, Global X added Global X FTSE Norway 30 ETF (NORW).

The MSCI 25/50 index names (pdf) refer to the requirement for registered investment companies (a tax category that includes ETFs) to not have more than a 25% weighting in a single stock and for the combined weights of all stocks with a greater than 5% weighting to not exceed 50% of the fund.  This makes customized indexes necessary for many smaller countries.  Even with the cap, EDEN, EFNL, and ENOR all have large weightings in their top constituents.  Additionally, sector representation should be considered before buying these funds.  ENOR has more than half its assets in Energy, EDEN has more than a third in Health Care, and EFNL has a 28% allocation to Industrials.

Here is the run down on the four new single-country small cap funds:

iShares MSCI Australia Small Cap Index Fund (EWAS) launched on January 26 with an expense ratio of 0.59%.  The underlying index is a free float-adjusted market cap weighted index targeting the bottom 14% of equity market capitalization in Australia.  The largest of the fund’s 206 holdings include APA Group 2.0%, Atlas Iron 1.9%, Commonwealth Property Office 1.9%, Treasury Wine Estates 1.8%, and UGL 1.7%.  Sector allocations include Materials 26.2%, Industrials 20.2%, Financials 13.2%, Consumer Discretionary 13.0%, and Energy 9.3%.  (EWAS overview)

iShares MSCI Canada Small Cap Index Fund (EWCS) launched on January 26 with an expense ratio of 0.59%.  The underlying index is a free float-adjusted market cap weighted index targeting the bottom 14% of equity market capitalization in Canada.  The largest of the 246 holdings include SXC Health Solutions 1.7%, Keyera 1.5%, Provident Energy 1.4%, Detour Gold 1.3%, and Quadra FNX Mining 1.3%.  Sector representation includes Materials 35.2%, Energy 26.7%, Financials 10.8%, Consumer Discretionary 7.9%, and Industrials 7.4%.  (EWCS overview)

iShares MSCI Germany Small Cap Index Fund(EWGS) launched on January 26 with an expense ratio of 0.59%.  The underlying index is a free float-adjusted market cap weighted index targeting the bottom 14% of equity market capitalization in Germany.  Largest of the 81 holdings include Bilfinger Berger 5.5%, MTU Aero Engines Holdings 4.6%, Symrise 4.3%, Rhoen-Klinikum 3.4%, and SGL Carbon 3.3%.  Sector representation includes Industrials 34.5%, Technology 14.5%, Consumer Discretionary 12.8%, Health Care 12.5%, and Materials 11.4%.  (EWGS overview)

iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small Cap Index Fund (EWUS) launched on January 26 with an expense ratio of 0.59%.  The underlying index is a free float-adjusted market cap weighted index targeting the bottom 14% of equity market capitalization in the United Kingdom.  Largest of the fund’s 268 holdings include IMI 1.6%, Croda International 1.5%, Pennon Group 1.4%, Informa 1.3%, and Gulf Keystone Petroleum 1.3%.  Sector representation includes Industrials 23.1%, Consumer Discretionary 21.2%, Financials 17.7%, Materials 10.0%, and Technology 9.4%.  (EWUS overview)

Analysis/Opinion: ETF investors can remember the tickers for these new ETFs by just adding an “S” to the end of the tickers of their large-cap counterparts (EWA, EWC, EWG, and EWU).  Since the latter group targets the largest 85% of the market cap within their respective countries, there should be little or no overlap between the existing large cap ETFs and the new small cap offerings.

The new offerings have two direct competitors: IQ Small Cap Australia ETF (KROO) and IQ Small Cap Canada ETF (CNDA).  They became the first ETFs in this space at their March 2010 launch.  Both may need to reduce their current 0.69% expense ratios in order to remain viable alternatives to EWAS and EWCS.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  Long EWU.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

You already know that “exchange traded funds” trade on an exchange.  That’s what distinguishes them from old-fashioned mutual funds.  But what exchange trades them, and where is it?

For some new iShares, the answer isn’t New York or Chicago.  Their trading hub is Lenexa, Kansas.  Let me explain …

Exchange Floors No Longer Needed

For most people, the term “stock exchange” brings to mind images of noisy rooms filled with men in colorful jackets, waving their arms and making cryptic hand motions.

At one time, this is exactly how trading got done — and the apparent chaos was actually very efficient.  But now, even the nimblest floor traders can’t compete with the speed and accuracy of modern computers.

An “exchange” isn’t a physical place anymore.  It’s a mechanism by which buyers and sellers find each other.  Nowadays, it happens in milliseconds.

Not surprisingly, then, there’s no longer a need for traders and exchanges to stay in lower Manhattan.  The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq don’t get it — yet.  They will.  Their customers are going BATS.

Kansas: The New ETF Capital

From its headquarters in a Kansas City suburb, BATS Global Markets is now the nation’s third-largest securities exchange.  The company launched its first trading system in 2006.  Then in 2008, it was acknowledged by the SEC as a “national securities exchange” on par with the NYSE and Nasdaq.  BATS is an acronym for “Better Alternative Trading System.”

The founders of  recognized that stock exchanges are really in the technology business.  Trade processing isn’t rocket science, and it doesn’t take financial genius.  The keys to success are accuracy, reliability, and low costs.

Locating in Kansas is a great way to keep your expenses down.  Everything from office space to taxes is much lower than New York.  Over time (and millions of transactions) the difference adds up.

BATS — maybe because it has some distance from the traditional exchange culture — is innovating in other ways, too.  The company is planning a “Competitive Liquidity Provider” program that will give market makers a financial incentive to increase liquidity and keep bid/ask spreads tighter.

It’s working: Last year BATS had an 11 percent share of U.S. stock market activity.  The firm’s European unit, when combined with another exchange BATS is in the process of acquiring, had a 25 percent market share.

Now BATS is going for the jugular.  The upstart wants to lure primary listings away from the big exchanges, starting with ETFs.  iShares was the first sponsor to make the leap — but I bet more will follow.

Why You Should Care!

For small investors, this may seem like “inside baseball.”  You may not know or care how it all works. You just want to buy and sell at a fair price.  You trust your broker to handle the details.

That’s exactly why you should be glad BATS is on the scene.  The competition they’re creating, both for listing fees and trading volume, is what keeps your costs down.

So whether you knew it at the time or not, the January 24 launch of iShares MSCI Norway Capped Investable Market Index Fund (ENOR) on BATS was a big deal!  ENOR was the first of seven new single-country ETFs from iShares in January.  BATS is the primary exchange for all of them.  Two more are coming soon.

I don’t know if iShares intends to keep listing new ETFs on BATS.  Nevertheless, the vote of confidence from the world’s largest ETF sponsor means something.

Unfortunately, some stock quote services are not yet set up to recognize BATS as the primary (or only) exchange for securities.  I expect this to be fixed soon.  But in the meantime, you may have a little trouble getting quotes on the BATS-listed ETFs.

Will BATS take over the world?  No — there will always be room for competition.  But the fact that this firm exists at all is still remarkable.

ETFs were a revolution in themselves.  They’ve transformed the entire money management industry.  Now the revolution is entering a new stage — and you’re set to be one of the winners.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  No positions in any of the securities mentioned.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  This article originally appeared in Money and Markets, a free daily investment newsletter from Weiss Research.  To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/.

ProShares 30 Year TIPS/TSY Spread (RINF) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.75% (RINF overview).  The underlying Dow Jones Credit Suisse 30-Year Inflation Breakeven Index tracks the performance of long positions in 30-year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) and duration-adjusted short positions in U.S. Treasury bonds of the closest maturity.  The difference in yield (or “spread”) between these bonds (Treasury yield minus TIPS yield) is commonly referred to as a “breakeven rate of inflation” and is considered to be a measure of the market’s expectations for inflation.  The index is designed to appreciate as the breakeven rate of inflation increases.  Additional information about the index is available at Dow Jones Indexes.  RINF is implementing this strategy with a combination of swaps and 30-year U.S. Treasury securities.

ProShares Short 30 Year TIPS/TSY Spread (FINF) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.75% (FINF overview).  The new ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Credit Suisse 30-Year Inflation Breakeven Index.  See the description of RINF above for additional information on the underlying index.  FINF is implementing this strategy with a combination of swaps and 30-year U.S. Treasury securities.

Analysis/Opinion:  RINF and FINF bill themselves as the first Breakeven Inflation ETFs.  However, PowerShares introduced similar inflation/deflation expectation products last month, although they were in an ETN wrapper.  Another major difference is that RINF/FINF target the 30-year spread while the INFL/DEFL pair from PowerShares measures the spread at three different maturities with 5-year securities nominally weighted at 50%, 10-year at 40%, and 30-year at 10%.  This should result in the new ProShares pair having more sensitivity (larger price swings) to changes in inflation expectations under most conditions.

SPDR S&P Small Cap Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMFS) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio of 0.65% (GMFS overview).  The underlying S&P Asia Pacific Emerging Under USD 2 Billion Index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to track the investable universe of publicly traded small-cap companies domiciled in emerging Asian Pacific markets.  Country weightings are Taiwan 39.7%, China 23.4%, India 13.8%, Malaysia 9.6%, Indonesia 6.4%, Thailand 5.7%, and the Philippines 2.5%.  Sector breakdown includes Technology 21.6%, Financials 17.1%, Industrials 15.8%, Consumer Discretionary 13.4%, and Materials 12.3%.  GMFS currently has 491 holdings with none exceeding a 1% weighting in the fund.

Analysis/Opinion:  GMFS is the small-cap complement to the large-cap SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) (GMF overview).  As is often the case, sector and country representations shift between large- and small-cap segments.  The large-cap GMF has its largest allocations going to China at 37.9% and Financials 25.2%.  Investors often mistake iShares Pacific ex-Japan (EPP) as being a competitive offering to GMF, but there is no overlap as EPP only covers developed markets.

PowerShares S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility Portfolio (EELV) listed on 1/13/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.29% (EELV overview).  The underlying S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index measures the performance of 200 of the least volatile stocks of the S&P Emerging BMI Plus LargeMid Cap Index.  Largest country allocations include Malaysia 23.3%, South Africa 18.6%, Taiwan 11.8%, Brazil 9.1%, and Chile 5.9%.  The sector breakdown has Financials at 25.4%, Utilities 15.4%, Consumer Staples 15.2%, Materials 10.1%, Telecommunications 10.0%, and Industrials 9.8%.  

PowerShares S&P International Developed Low Volatility Portfolio (IDLV) listed on 1/13/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.25% (IDLV overview).  The underlying S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index measures the performance of 200 of the least volatile stocks of the S&P Developed ex US and South Korea LargeMid Cap BMI Index.  Largest country allocations include Canada 20.3%, Japan 16.6%, U.K. 11.4%, Singapore 11.2%, and New Zealand 9.3%.  Sectors with more than 10% weightings include Financials 22.4%, Consumer Staples 17.9%, Industrials 14.0%, Consumer Discretionary 11.2%, Utilities 11.0%, and Health Care 10.3%. 

Analysis/Opinion:  PowerShares is trying to capitalize on the roaring success of its PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio (SPLV) launched last May [Analysis of New High Beta and Low Volatility ETFs from PowerShares].  Not only did SPLV deliver on its promise of low volatility, but it also generated above average returns while kicking out above average yield.  Although not marketed as a dividend ETF, SPLV is now part of my ETF Dividend & Income Strategy.  I suspect EELV and IDLV will also be success stories.  IDLV has a current yield of about 3.5% while EELV yield data is not available at this time.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EMEA Index Fund (EEME) listed on 1/19/12 with an expense ratio of 0.49% (EEME overview).  The underlying index is a free float adjusted market capitalization weighted index that measures equity performance of the emerging market countries of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”).  The largest of the 131 holdings includes Gazprom 10.0%, Lukoil 4.6%, MTN Group 4.4%, Sasol 4.3%, and Sberbank 4.0%.  The largest sector allocations fall to Energy 28.1%, Financials 24.6%, Materials 15.7%, and Telecommunications 10.6%.  Country weightings include South Africa 44%, Russia 30%, Poland 8%, and Turkey 7%.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index Fund (EEML) listed on 1/19/12 with an expense ratio of 0.49% (EEML overview).  The underlying index is a free float adjusted market capitalization weighted index that measures equity market performance of Latin American emerging markets.  The largest of the 124 holdings includes Petrobras 7.0%, Vale 6.0%, American Movil 5.6%, and ITAU Unibanco 5.4%.  The five largest sector weightings are Financials 21.5%, Materials 21.1%, Energy 16.2%, Consumer Staples 14.4%, and Telecommunications 8.0%.  Country breakdown includes Brazil at 65%, Mexico 20%, Chile 8%, Columbia 4%, and Peru less than 1%.

Analysis/Opinion:  With these two new ETFs, iShares has begun the process of providing ETFs that divide the emerging markets into three major regions.  They have yet to offer the third region:  Emerging Market Asia Pacific.  However, as mentioned above in the GMFS analysis, the SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) is such a fund.

AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Opportunities (ACCU) listed on 1/26/12 with an expense ratio of 1.78% that is capped at 1.80% (ACCU overview).  It is an actively managed fund-of-funds ETF targeting long-term capital appreciation in excess of the MSCI All Country World Index.  The portfolio manager, Accuvest Global Advisors, selects a portfolio of U.S. listed country-specific exchange traded funds (ETFs), using its proprietary multi-factor country ranking model.  Its current holdings and allocations are iShares MSCI Thailand (THD) 21.7%, iShares S&P 500 (IVV) 20.1%, iShares MSCI Brazil (EWZ) 15.6%, iShares MSCI South Africa (EZA) 14.9%, iShares MSCI Russia Capped (ERUS) 13.5%, and iShares FTSE China 25 (FXI) 13.0%.

Analysis/Opinion:  The AdvisorShares fee capping process and description leaves much to be desired.  It states the fees for ACCU will be capped at 1.25%, but the cap does not apply to the acquired fund fee expenses of 0.55%.  Therefore, the actual cap of 1.80% (1.25% + 0.55%) exceeds the stated gross expense ratio of 1.78%.  The ACCU prospectus (pdf) includes a discussion of the past performance of the portfolio manager, including charts and tables showing it underperformed its benchmark for the past 1-year and 5-year periods.

ProShares German Sovereign/Sub-Sovereign ETF (GGOV) listed on 1/26/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.45% (GGOV overview).  The underlying Markit iBoxx EUR Germany Sovereign & Sub-Sovereign Liquid Index measures the performance of fixed rate debt securities of the Federal Republic of Germany as well as local governments and entities or agencies guaranteed by various German governments.  It has 33 constituents with an average yield to maturity of 1.9% and a modified adjusted duration of 4.8 years.  The fund currently holds about half of its assets in swaps with the other 50% directly in the underlying bonds.

Analysis/Opinion:  The relatively low yield of GGOV will likely make it more sensitive to currency fluctuations than interest rates.  GGOV will compete with PIMCO Germany Bond Index Fund (BUND), which also includes German corporate bonds.  Additionally, there is PowerShares DB German Bund Futures ETN (BUNL), which is an exchange-traded note and does not issue dividends.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  Long SPLV and THD.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

Among the first listings of 2012 were three “volatility response” ETFs from Direxion, which attempt to achieve consistent volatility by controlling equity exposure based on observed volatility.  The first actively managed ETF launch of the year employs a Sector Scoring and Allocation Methodology (“SectorSAM)” to select other ETFs in a market neutral approach.  Two single-country (Singapore and Hong Kong) small cap ETFs were introduced by iShares, along with a fund covering all developed markets of the world.

1) Direxion S&P 1500 RC Volatility Response Shares (VSPR) listed on 1/11/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.45% (VSPR overview).  The new Risk Control (“RC”) ETF seeks to provide a targeted risk level of 15% (annualized standard deviation) using a quantitative rules-based approach to dynamically reallocate exposure between equities (S&P 1500 Index) and U.S. Treasury Bills (T-Bills).

2) Direxion S&P 500 RC Volatility Response Shares (VSPY) listed on 1/11/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.45% (VSPY overview).  The new ETF seeks to provide a targeted risk level of 15% using a quantitative rules-based approach to dynamically reallocate exposure between equities (S&P 500 Index) and U.S. Treasury Bills (T-Bills).

3) Direxion S&P Latin America 40 RC Volatility Response Shares (VLAT) listed on 1/11/12 with an expense ratio capped at 0.45% (VLAT overview).  The new ETF seeks to provide a targeted risk level of 18% using a quantitative rules-based approach to dynamically reallocate exposure between equities (S&P Latin America 40) and U.S. Treasury Bills (T-Bills).

Analysis/Opinion: The “RC” in the name stands for Risk Control.  Investors should not confuse the use of “Volatility” in the fund names with other ETFs that track VIX volatility futures.  Instead, for these new ETFs, the measured volatility of the related equity index functions as a throttle to vary the equity exposure as a means of producing the targeted volatility levels.  I am a proponent of targeted-volatility investing and therefore have keen interest in these new products.

Barclays ETN+ S&P VEQTOR ETN (VQT) is another product that attempts to hedge away the negative impacts of volatility.  However, rather than varying the exposure between equities and cash, the underlying index for VQT varies the exposure between equities and VIX futures.

4) AdvisorShares Rockledge SectorSAM ETF (SSAM) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio capped at 1.50% (SSAM overview).  It is an actively managed fund-of-funds ETF hoping to “generate stable and consistent annual returns under all market conditions” using a market neutral approach.  The portfolio manager, Rockledge Advisors, uses its Sector Scoring and Allocation Methodology (“SectorSAM”) to buy sector ETFs it forecasts to outperform the S&P 500 while selling short an equal dollar amount of sector ETFs it believes will underperform. 

The methodology currently focuses on the Sector SPDR ETFs, so only nine sectors are used instead of the ten defined by GICS.  As of 1/22/12, the fund was long Materials (XLB) 34.4%, Technology (XLK) 33.9%, and Energy (XLE) 33.3%.  It was short Financials (XLF) -21.5%, Consumer Staples (XLP) -18.1%, Health Care (XLV) -17.2%, Consumer Discretionary (XLY) -16.3%, Industrials (XLI) -15.4%, and Utilities (XLU) -5.4%.  For the SPDR Select Sector family, the Telecommunications sector is included as part of Technology.

Analysis/Opinion: With indexed ETFs, we can generally expect the performance characteristics to mimic those of the underlying index.  With actively managed ETFs, there is no index, so the sponsor must give us some other means by which to set our expectations.  For SSAM we are told to expect “stable and consistent annual returns under all market conditions.”  However, we are not given any further information regarding the expected annual returns, the standard deviation (stability), or the past performance of the portfolio manager.  On the plus side, SSAM does not have much in the way of competition with Guggenheim Sector Rotation (XRO) on ETF Deathwatch.

5) iShares MSCI Hong Kong Small Cap Index Fund (EWHS) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio of 0.59% (EWHS overview).  The underlying MSCI Hong Kong Small Cap Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index targeting the bottom 14% of the capitalization of Hong Kong securities.  The fund has 45 holdings with the largest allocations currently going to VTech Holdings 5.1%, Champion REIT 4.8%, Espirit Holdings 4.8%, AAC Technologies Holdings 4.6%, and Techtronic Industries 4.0%.  Sector composition is heavily skewed toward Consumer Discretionary at 44.1%, followed by Financials 18.5%, Industrials 12.2%, and Technology 9.2%.

Analysis/Opinion:  Blackrock is taking advantage of what I perceive to be the premature closure of IQ Hong Kong Small Cap ETF (former ticker HKK).  Index IQ shuttered its offering in December, just seven months after launch.  As I mentioned in my initial HKK review, Hong Kong small cap funds should have no overlap with the holdings of iShares MSCI Hong Kong (EWH) (EWH overview) and offer vastly different sector exposure.

6) iShares MSCI Singapore Small Cap Index Fund (EWSS) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio of 0.59% (EWSS overview).  The underlying MSCI Singapore Small Cap Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index targeting the bottom 14% of equity market capitalization.  The fund has 38 holdings with the largest allocations currently going to Suntec REIT 7.7%, Capitacommercial Trust 7.6%, Venture Corp 4.2%, Biosensors International Group 4.0%, and SATS 4.0%.  Current sector composition has Financials at a hefty 48.8%, then Industrials 18.2%, Energy 6.2%, Technology 6.1%, and Consumer Staples 5.6%.

Analysis/Opinion:  This is the first ETF to offer access to Singapore small cap stocks.  By design, it should have no overlap with the holdings of iShares MSCI Singapore (EWS) (EWS overview) which targets the largest 85% of market capitalization in Singapore.  The top two sectors are the same for both funds with the large cap EWS having 42.9% in Financials and 24.9% in Industrials.

7) iShares MSCI World Index Fund (URTH) listed on 1/12/12 with an expense ratio of 0.24% (URTH overview).  The underlying MSCI World Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index targeting the developed markets of the world.  The fund has 1,490 holdings, and the five largest currently happen to all be U.S. companies: Exxon Mobil (XON) 1.8%, Apple (AAPL) 1.7%, International Business Machines (IBM) 1.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) 1.0%, and Chevron (CVX) 0.9%.  Country representation has the U.S. at 52.7%, U.K. 9.8%, Japan 9.1%, Canada 5.2%, and France 3.8%.  Sector breakdown includes Financials 17.7%, Technology 12.0%, Energy 11.8%, Industrials 11.1%, and Consumer Staples 11.0%.

Analysis/Opinion:  The name of the underlying index, and hence the ETF, is potentially misleading because the index does not include stocks from emerging market countries, which currently account for about 15% of the world’s equity market cap.  More appropriate names might be MSCI Developed World, MSCI 85% of the World, or MSCI EAFE + US + Canada.  By excluding emerging markets, URTH can make the claim that it is the only global ETF providing this level of coverage.  If you prefer a “world fund” that includes emerging markets, then consider iShares MSCI ACWI (ACWI) or Vanguard Total World Stock (VT).

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  Long XLV and AAPL.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

Today we’ll look at some interesting patterns in last year’s sector action — which was quite different from the broad market.  Then I will make an observation about the way 2012 is starting off.

Little Sectors Win the Year

Standard & Poor’s classifies every individual stock into one of ten primary sectors.  They then publish specific indexes for each sector (as well as dozens of sub-sectors within the ten primaries).

So let’s see how each sector performed.  Some were above-average while others lagged.

Hmmm, what’s going on here?  Only three sectors had a losing year, and one of those was off less than 3 percent.  Meanwhile three other sectors had double-digit gains.  So how did the index end up at break-even?

The answer lies in the fact the S&P 500 is capitalization weighted.  This simply means that each stock — and therefore each sector — influences the overall index in proportion to its size.

As of 12/30/2011, the stocks in the S&P 500 had an adjusted market cap totaling almost $11.4 trillion.  Now, as we did above, let’s break it down by sector.

Now the index returns make more sense.  One of the three largest sectors (Financials) dropped 18.4 percent for the year.  The other two biggies (Technology and Energy) had gains in the low single digits.

Conversely, the best-performing sectors tended to be smaller …

Utilities had a great year, but that group represents only 3.9 percent of the S&P 500′s value.  The year’s other two big winners, Consumer Staples and Health Care, are middle sized.  This pair kept Financials from dragging the whole index down.

A Good Time to Stay Defensive

Another thing to notice about last year: The winning sectors were those traditionally thought of as “defensive.”  Utilities, Consumer Staples, and Health Care are often among the best havens in a weak economy.  That was certainly the case in 2011.

Will 2012 be the same?  Of course I don’t know what will happen, but I see some clues.

Utilities had a big rally in the last two weeks of the year.  SPDR S&P Utilities (XLU) gained about 5 percent in that short period … then lost half of those gains in the first week of January.

To me, this looks a lot like year-end “window dressing.”  That’s when portfolio managers pile into the yearly or quarterly winners so their clients will think they’ve been in the best stocks all along.  Once the calendar turned, buying interest dried up and the Utilities sector fell.

Health Care, on the other hand, has shown much steadier recent results.  SPDR S&P Health Care (XLV) actually outperformed XLU in the last quarter of 2011, rising 10 percent vs 8.2 percent for the Utilities ETF.

Bottom line: Not all “defensive” sectors are always equal.  I suspect Health Care will continue to outperform.  If you agree and would like to bet on this trend, here are the five largest diversified health care ETFs to consider:

• SPDR Health Care Select Sector (XLV)
• Vanguard Health Care (VHT)
• iShares Dow Jones U.S. Healthcare (IYH)
• iShares S&P Global Healthcare (IXJ)
• First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX (FXH)

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  Long XLV.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  This article originally appeared in Money and Markets, a free daily investment newsletter from Weiss Research.  To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/.

What’s Wrong with Japan?

I’ve been to Japan many times.  I love the country and the people.  Yet I have to tell you that now is not the time to invest in Japanese stock ETFs.  Yes, I know the Nikkei Dow looks oversold, but it’s looked that way for years.  As I’ve explained before, calling a bottom is tough.  And I don’t think Japan is there yet.  Here are six reasons why:

#1 — Strong Yen

The yen was very strong in 2011 … which is bad news because it makes Japan’s exports relatively more expensive.  And exports are a BIG part of the national economy for Japan.

The authorities are well aware of this, of course, but there isn’t much they can do about it.  The Bank of Japan intervened multiple times last year.  In every case, the impact of their actions was gone within a few days.

#2 — European Recession

A huge chunk of Japanese exports go to Europe.  As you’ve surely noticed, the euro zone is having a few problems.  A severe recession — or at best a few years of low growth — seem likely for 2012 and beyond.

If Europeans have no money to spend, their demand for imports (from Japan and elsewhere) is going to plummet.  This is another bad sign for Japan.

#3 — Hungry Competitors

Japan reached economic success by beating the developed countries in cheap, efficient manufacturing.  Now they have competitors: Taiwan, South Korea, Brazil, India … and of course China.

The challenge for Japan is that all these other countries can do the very same things that put Japan on the map.  And in some cases, they can do it better.  Nations like Brazil have other advantages, too, like better access to natural resources and geographical proximity to key markets.

#4 — Aging Population

Japan is, on average, one of the oldest nations on the planet.  Furthermore, the relatively small number of young adults has a very low birth rate.

The resulting imbalance is making it harder and harder for Japanese industry to keep growing.  Older workers hang on to their jobs for dear life while younger people have no way to gain skills.  We’re seeing a similar pattern here in the U.S., but in Japan it’s a much bigger problem.

#5 — Massive Government Debt

Japan’s national debt is projected to surpass 1 quadrillion yen in 2012.  A big cause is the population imbalance noted above.  All those older people require heavy spending on health care and pensions.

To stay afloat, Japan will almost certainly need to raise taxes on both individuals and businesses.  And higher taxes won’t make it any easier to create economic growth.  

#6 — Political Instability

Japan’s parliamentary government used to work pretty well.  Now it’s turning almost as dysfunctional as Italy and Greece.

Consider this: Japan has had six different prime ministers since 2006.  The current occupant, Yoshihiko Noda, took office in September 2011 and is already under fire.

The real problem isn’t the government; it’s the voters and their unrealistic expectations.  Changing leadership is just a symptom.

Japan-Heavy ETFs to Avoid

Japan may well have short-term rallies in 2012, but I still think the best opportunities will be elsewhere.  Here are some ETFs with heavy Japan exposure:

• WisdomTree Japan Small Cap Dividend (DFJ)
• WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity (DXJ)
• iShares MSCI Japan (EWJ)
• iShares S&P/Topix Japan 150 (ITF)
• SPDR Russell/Nomura Japan (JPP)
• SPDR Russell MidCap Japan (JSC)
• iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap (SCJ)
• db-X MSCI Japan Currency-Hedged Equity (DBJP)
• MAXIS Nikkei 225 Index Fund (NKY)
• Vanguard MSCI Pacific ETF (VPL) (62% allocation to Japan)

If any of these are in your portfolio, I suggest you look for a chance to get out as soon as possible.

There is an ETF that is designed to go up as Japanese stocks fall.  ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) is a 2x leveraged inverse fund.  However, I don’t recommend EWV as a long-term investment.  It is a short-term trading instrument.  (See Three Overlooked Risks of Inverse ETFs to learn more.)

So what do you do with the cash you aren’t investing in Japan?

Good news: You have plenty of opportunities elsewhere.  I’ll be telling you about some of them in my Money and Markets columns as the year unfolds.  And if you’d like more specific recommendations on what to buy and sell, click here and check out my International ETF Trader service.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher:  No positions in any of the securities mentioned.  No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  This article originally appeared in Money and Markets, a free daily investment newsletter from Weiss Research.  To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/.

The 36 additions consisted of 27 ETFs and nine ETNs.  Three-quarters of them just came out of the six-month new product grace period.  Given the record number of new launches in 2011, the Deathwatch list seems likely to grow further in the coming months.

Only two of the ten funds coming off the list managed to do so gracefully.  iShares MSCI Ireland Capped Investable Market (EIRL) and Russell 2000 High Momentum ETF (SHMO) had increases in trading activity.  The other eight removals were all funds that closed in December.

The 268 current members consist of 201 ETFs and 67 ETNs.  The ETF count includes 17 of the 39 (44%) currently listed actively-managed funds.  The average age of products on the list is just under two years at 23.3 months, while assets average just $5.7 million each.

Typically, only a few products go an entire month with no trading activity.  For December, the number surged to seven and six of them came from the iPath brand.  For the third month in a row, iPath US Treasury 5-Year Bull ETN (DFVL) had no trading activity at all.  It would have been four calendar months but for a small trade on September 1, 2011.  DFVL’s inability to attract any volume is even more alarming given the fact that it represents one of the year’s best performing asset classes.  It is truly a zombie ETF.

iPath Long Enhanced MSCI EAFE Index ETN (MFLA) is not far behind, having last traded on October 4, 2011.  The other five products with zero activity for the month December were iPath Pure Beta Aluminum ETN (FOIL), iPath Pure Beta Energy ETN (ONG), iPath Pure Beta S&P GSCI-Weighted ETN (SBV), iPath Short Enhanced (-2x) MSCI EAFE Index ETN (MFSA), and Russell Small Cap Contrarian ETF (SCTR).

The 36 ETPs Added to ETF Deathwatch for January 2012:

1. AdvisorShares Madrona Domestic ETF (FWDD)
2. AdvisorShares Madrona Global Bond ETF (FWDB)
3. AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF (FWDI)
4. AdvisorShares Meidell Tactical Advantage ETF (MATH)
5. Credit Suisse Merger Arb Liquid 2x Monthly ETN (CSMB)
6. db-X MSCI Brazil Currency-Hedged Equity (DBBR)
7. db-X MSCI Canada Currency-Hedged Equity (DBCN)
8. db-X MSCI Emerging Markets Currency-Hedged Equity (DBEM)
9. db-X MSCI Japan Currency-Hedged Equity (DBJP)
10. Direxion Daily Agribusiness Bear 3x (COWS)
11. Direxion Daily Basic Materials Bear 3x (MATS)
12. Direxion Daily Healthcare Bear 3x (SICK)
13. Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x (CURE)
14. Direxion Daily Total Market Bear 1x (TOTS)
15. EGShares Basic Materials GEMS ETF (LGEM)
16. EGShares Consumer Goods GEMS ETF (GGEM)
17. EGShares Consumer Services GEMS ETF (VGEM)
18. EGShares Health Care GEMS ETF (HGEM)
19. EGShares Industrials GEMS ETF (IGEM)
20. EGShares Technology GEMS ETF (QGEM)
21. EGShares Telecom GEMS ETF (TGEM)
22. EGShares Utilities GEMS ETF (UGEM)
23. ELEMENTS MLCX Biofuels ETN (FUE)
24. Global X Farming ETF (BARN)
25. Guggenheim ABC High Dividend ETF (ABCS)
26. iPath DJ-UBS Lead ETN (LD)
27. iPath EUR/USD Exchange Rate ETN (ERO)
28. iPath US Treasury 2-year Yield Bull ETN (DTUL)
29. IQ US Real Estate Small Cap ETF (ROOF)
30. Morgan Stanley Cushing MLP High Income ETN (MLPY)
31. Morgan Stanley S&P 500 Crude Oil ETN (BARL)
32. PowerShares Fundamental Pure Large Growth (PXLG)
33. PowerShares Global Nuclear Energy (PKN)
34. SPDR S&P International Energy (IPW)
35. UBS ETRACS Natural Gas Futures Contango ETN (GASZ)
36. UBS ETRACS Oil Futures Contango ETN (OILZ)

The 10 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch for January 2012:

1. HOLDRS Europe 2001 (EKH) closed
2. HOLDRS Internet Infrastructure (IIH) closed
3. HOLDRS Merrill Lynch Market 2000+ (MKH) closed
4. HOLDRS Wireless (WMH) closed
5. IQ Hong Kong Small Cap ETF (HKK) closed
6. IQ Taiwan Small Cap (TWON) closed
7. iShares MSCI Ireland Capped Investable Market (EIRL)
8. Jefferies|TR/J CRB Global Agriculture Equity (CRBA) closed
9. Jefferies|TR/J CRB Global Industrial Metals Equity (CRBI) closed
10. Russell 2000 High Momentum ETF (SHMO)

The ETF Deathwatch criteria produced the following list of 268 ETPs for January:

ETF Deathwatch for January 2012

Data sources:  Daily prices and volume of individual ETPs from Norgate Premium Data, AUM from the ETF Industry Association, and all other information compiled by Invest With An Edge.

Past issues of ETF Deathwatch are available here.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, and publisher: No positions in any of the securities mentioned. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

Closure activity hit a new monthly high with 23 delistings.  The previous record was set in May 2009 when PowerShares cleaned house by closing down 19 faltering funds.  All 23 closures in December were ETFs (no ETNs) and resulted in seven fewer product listings at month’s end.  This was the first monthly decline of ETP listings since May 2010.

The year ended with 1,369 exchange-traded products listed for trading in US markets.  The current count, consisting of 1,166 ETFs and 203 ETNs, represents a 24.6% increase over year-end 2010.  Actively managed ETFs remain an insignificant portion of the population, numbering just 39.

Asset growth did not keep pace with product growth.  Total assets under management ended the year at $1.06 trillion, only 5.1% above the $1.01 trillion at the start of the year.

For the month of December, assets under management slipped by 0.4%.  Trading activity declined about 19%, which is not surprising given the typical light volume during the year-end holidays.  The decline was not equally shared between ETFs and ETNs, with ETF daily average dollar volume dropping 18.9% while ETN trading saw a massive 41.8% dropoff.  Dollar volume across all products averaged just $63.5 billion per day. 

The number of ETFs averaging more than $1 billion in daily trading activity (the Billion Dollar Club) plunged from 13 to just 7 in December while still accounting for more than 56% of all ETP dollars traded.  Products averaging more than $100 million of trading per day decreased from 76 to 68 while grabbing 88.9% of all ETP dollar volume.

Data sources:  Daily prices and volume of individual ETPs from Norgate Premium Data, AUM from ETF Industry Association, fund counts and all other information compiled by Invest With An Edge.

New products launched in December (in chronological order), along with links to my initial analysis of each:

1. SPDR Barclays Capital Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) [Two New SPDR Bond ETFs Extend Lineup]
2. SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term Treasury ETF (SST)
3. Global X NASDAQ 500 ETF (QQQV) [Global X Introduces ETFs Of New NASDAQ Indexes]
4. Global X NASDAQ 400 Mid Cap ETF (QQQM)
5. PowerShares DB US Inflation ETN (INFL) [Inflation/Deflation ETN Pair Available from PowerShares]
6. PowerShares DB US Deflation ETN (DEFL)
7. Direxion All Cap Insider Sentiment Shares ETF (KNOW) [Direxion Launches Two Insider ETFs: KNOW and INSD]
8. Direxion Large Cap Insider Sentiment Shares ETF (INSD)
9. Global X FTSE Greece 20 ETF (GREK) [GREK Gets You To The Greek]
10. RBS NASDAQ 100 Trendpilot ETN (TNDQ) [RBS Extends Trendpilot Concept to NASDAQ 100]
11. Market Vectors Bank and Brokerage ETF (RKH)
12. Market Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH)
13. Market Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH)
14. Market Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH)
15. Market Vectors Retail ETF (RTH)
16. Market Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Product closures/delistings in December (sorted by name):

1. Guggenheim BulletShares 2011 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCB) [BSCB: Not Your Typical ETF Closure]
2. HOLDRS B2B Internet (BHH) [Termination of 17 HOLDRS Marks End of an Era]
3. HOLDRS Biotech (BBH)
4. HOLDRS Broadband (BDH)
5. HOLDRS Europe 2001 (EKH)
6. HOLDRS Internet (HHH)
7. HOLDRS Internet Architecture (IAH)
8. HOLDRS Internet Infrastructure (IIH)
9. HOLDRS Market 2000+ (MKH)
10. HOLDRS Oil Service (OIH)
11. HOLDRS Pharmaceutical (PPH)
12. HOLDRS Regional Bank (RKH)
13. HOLDRS Retail (RTH)
14. HOLDRS Semiconductor (SMH)
15. HOLDRS Software (SWH)
16. HOLDRS Telecom (TTH)
17. HOLDRS Wireless (WMH)
18. HOLDRS Utilities (UTH)
19. IQ Taiwan Small Cap ETF (TWON) [Three IndexIQ ETFs To Disappear Today]
20. IQ Hong Kong Small Cap ETF (HKK)
21. IQ Japan Mid Cap ETF (RSUN)
22. Jefferies | TR/J CRB Global Agriculture Equity Index Fund (CRBA) [Last Day For CRBA and CRBI]
23. Jefferies | TR/J CRB Global Industrial Metals Equity Index Fund (CRBI)

Product changes in December:

1. AdvisorShares performed an extreme-makeover of an ETF rather than closing and liquidating the old one and launching a new one.  AdvisorShares Mars Hill Global Relative Value (GRV) received a new name, new ticker symbol, new objective, new manager, and new portfolio effective 12/1/11.  It is now known as the AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Long Short ETF (AGLS).
2. All Direxion Shares 2x Bull and Bear ETFs converted to 3x leverage on 12/1/11.  The change affected ten ETFs.
3. Guggenheim Enhanced Ultra-Short Bond ETF (GSY) became Guggenheim Enhanced Short Duration Bond ETF (GSY) effective 12/5/11.
4. Global X China Technology Fund (CHIB) changed its name, ticker, underlying index, and listing exchange, becoming the Global X NASDAQ China Technology ETF (QQQC) effective 12/13/11.
5. The exchange offer for six HOLDRS into similar new Market Vector ETFs (which was initiated 11/10/11) successfully closed on 12/20/11 with about two-thirds of the available shares/assets transferring.

Announced Product Changes for Coming Months:

1. Global X announced that February 16, 2012 will be the last day of trading for 8 Global X ETFs (pdf).  The closing funds are Global X Russell Emerging Markets Growth (EMGX), Global X Russell Emerging Markets Value (EMVX), Global X Mexico Small-Cap (MEXS), Global X Oil Equities (XOIL), Global X Farming (BARN), Global X Fishing Industry (FISN), Global X Food (EATX), and Global X Waste Management (WSTE).

Previous monthly ETF statistics reports are available here.

Disclosure covering writer, editor, publisher, and affiliates: No positions in any of the securities mentioned. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.  No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.