5 Obstacles Facing Active ETFs

June 26, 2009 by  
Filed under Actively Managed ETFs, Commentary, ETFs

Actively managed ETFs have been touted as the ultimate ETF product.  So far it has been all hype, or as they say “all show and no go”.  With so much buzz, you would think at least one active product would have gained some traction.  That is not the case.  I haven’t looked at the detailed data yet, but I am willing to make a gentleman’s bet that the two new 3x ETFs launched by ProShares yesterday have already seen more trading action than all of the actively managed ETFs throughout all of recorded history.

Someday, actively managed ETFs may become a significant portion of the ETF marketplace, but for now five obstacles are separating hope from reality:

  1. Classical/traditional index investors have long used index funds in their asset allocation strategies.  This class of investors is migrating to index-based ETFs in order to accomplish the same thing with lower costs and lower tax consequences.  Because they don’t believe in active management, they will never purchase an actively managed ETF.
  2. Many active managers include ETFs along with stocks in their portfolios (this applies to both institutional and retail investors).  These investors/managers believe that “they” are responsible for adding the “active” management (alpha) to the portfolio.  Therefore, they would rather use indexed (aka passive) ETFs to provide the exposure they desire.  For example, if the desire is to overweight the energy sector or small cap value, the manager will choose an ETF covering that niche.  Since no one can predict what sectors or styles an actively managed ETF will own next month or the month after that, these investors have no use for actively managed ETFs.
  3. Day traders and hedge funds use ETFs in much the same way as the investors outlined in obstacle #2 above, except they trade much more frequently, require very high liquidity (both in high volume and very narrow bid/ask spreads), and need transparency in order to fit an ETF into their trading models.  These investors will have no interest in actively managed ETFs unless and until they reach the top of the charts in terms of volume, liquidity, and transparency.
  4. Investors who like actively managed open-end mutual funds typically buy only funds with a three-year or five-year track record that allows them to evaluate the management.  Even if the manager is already well-known, they will not simply presume that an ETF version of a familiar mutual fund will deliver the same results.  They will want to see an actively managed ETF perform well over a multi-year period before taking the plunge.
  5. Many successful (in terms of assets under management) actively managed mutual funds have had well-known figures at the helm: Peter Lynch, Bill Miller, Tom Marsico, Mario Gabelli, Don Yacktman, and so on.  People who want active management seem more likely to invest with a familiar face, even if the hard numbers are not as attractive as the alternatives.  To date, none of the actively managed ETFs have featured a name-brand manager.  Once that happens, refer to obstacle #4 above.

Disclosure:  no positions in actively managed ETFs

Comments

2 Responses to “5 Obstacles Facing Active ETFs”

  1. Active ETFs: Full Steam Ahead | ETF Database on July 9th, 2009 10:24 am

    [...] Earlier this year, Grail Advisors launched the Grail American Beacon Large Cap Value ETF (GVT), the first truly actively-managed ETF (in the sense that it does not rely on proprietary models, but rather affords its managers total discretion in buy and sell decisions). While the initial response to GVT was lukewarm, the fund has gathered some momentum in recent weeks, and its success was enough for Grail to file for four additional actively-managed ETFs, each of which would have a single manager (GVT has three managers in order to address frontrunning issues arising from its disclosure requirements). [...]

  2. Ron Rowland on July 12th, 2009 8:50 am

    So far, GVT is a total bust. I’m not sure what data you are looking at to claim “..the fund has gathered some momentum in recent weeks, and its success was enough for Grail to file for four additional actively-managed ETFs…”

    Facts:
    1) GVT had zero volume 8 of the past 13 market days (zero volume 61% of the time).
    2) GVT had zero volume the last week of June
    3) GVT traded 100 shares on Wed (7/8)
    4) GVT traded zero shares yesterday (7/9)
    5) GVT has traded 500 shares (so far) today
    6) GVT is not gaining any momentum in either price or volume

    Grail did not file for more ETFs based on the success of GVT, Grail filed for additional funds despite the failure (so far) of GVT.

Free Special Report

With interest rates near zero, how can you generate income with your nest egg? Our free special report shows you how. cover art
You will also receive our weekly market commentary and unique analysis based on our Edge Charts. Privacy

The Market Today

Subscribe to Commentary

Sign up HERE to get breaking news from Invest With An Edge & other updates.